Market access
Systems used in the EU need a clear route through the applicable rules, whatever the organisation’s location.
AI Act ComplianceMade simple.
See which EU AI Act rules affect an AI system you use, sell or bring into the EU.
Where we are now
The dates that matter
The Digital Omnibus changed when the high-risk rules arrive. The milestones already in force remain in place.
Updated for Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published on July 24th, 2026
- AI literacy and prohibited practicesThe first prohibited-practice rules and the AI literacy framework began to apply.
- Governance and GPAI obligationsEU governance provisions and obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models became applicable.
-
Transparency and wider applicationArticle 50 transparency duties and most remaining AI Act provisions apply, subject to the amended transitions.
- Content marking transition and new prohibited practicesThe transition point for certain pre-existing generative systems and the new prohibited-practice provisions applies.
- Stand-alone high-risk systemsThe high-risk rules for systems classified under Article 6(2) and Annex III apply.
- High-risk systems in regulated productsThe high-risk rules for systems classified under Article 6(1) and Annex I apply.
What is at stake
Why the legal route of each use case matters
The Regulation does not ask whether an organisation uses AI. It asks what a specific system does, who supplies or operates it, and where its output lands. Those answers decide which duties apply.
Four consequences follow from getting that reading right early.
Meaningful exposure
The Regulation carries significant consequences. A reliable first classification helps identify where fuller work is needed.
Earlier decisions
Understanding the route early makes it easier to assign ownership, prepare records and make informed product decisions.
Clearer communication
Where transparency duties apply, people need appropriate notices or labels. Good governance makes that work easier.
Free assessment
Start with one system, not the whole Regulation
RRCS asks about a single AI use case: what it does, who operates it, how it reaches people and what evidence already exists. It returns an indicative reading of role and risk with the provisions that matter, in about two minutes.
- One question at a timeFollow-up questions appear only where your answers raise them.
- Role and risk signalsProvider, deployer, importer or distributor, and the risk category each answer points to.
- Practical next stepsWhat to record, what to decide and where qualified legal work is needed.
- Saved to your workspaceA verified account keeps the answers and the report available to return to.
Choose your path to AI compliance
Start with the level of support that fits the work in front of you.
RRCS
Check one AI use case, its role and its main legal signals.
Start RRCSGuides and Library
Explore the public guides, reference material and practical resources before or after an assessment.
Explore the guidesLegal support
Bring the use case, facts and available records for tailored advice.
View servicesYour workspace
Save assessments and access protected resources through a verified account.
Create an account“For Europe to become ‘the AI continent’ that can attract the best talent, we must swiftly implement the AI Act”
Frequently asked questions
What the Regulation covers and where RRCS fits.
What is the EU AI Act?
It is the EU Regulation establishing a risk-based framework for AI systems and general-purpose AI models. The applicable route depends on what the system does, who supplies or uses it and how the system or its output reaches the EU.
Who must comply?
Providers, deployers, importers, distributors, product manufacturers and authorised representatives may have duties. The answer depends on the operator role, the system, its risk signals and the context in which it is supplied or used. One organisation may occupy more than one role.
Does it apply outside the EU?
It can. The framework can reach providers outside the EU that place systems or general-purpose AI models on the EU market, as well as certain providers and deployers where an AI system’s output is used in the EU. The territorial link and any relevant exclusion still need to be checked against the facts.
What are the four risk categories?
A useful first orientation distinguishes prohibited practices, high-risk systems, systems subject to transparency duties and other uses with limited or no system-specific AI Act duties. General-purpose AI models have a separate set of rules, so the four-part shorthand does not describe every obligation.
What does RRCS do?
RRCS screens one AI use case for scope, operator role, risk signals and evidence readiness. It provides a preliminary route and practical next actions. A final legal conclusion requires the relevant facts and documents to be checked in full.
Why create a free account?
A verified account lets you save assessments, return to your workspace and access protected downloads. The Guide and Library remain publicly readable, while verification protects saved reports and downloadable resources.
Free assessment
One system, two minutes, a clear legal route
Run RRCS on the AI use case that matters most, then decide whether you need qualified legal support.
- 1Answer
What the system does, who operates it and how its output reaches people.
- 2Read your route
Operator role, risk signals and the provisions that apply to your case.
- 3Decide
What to record now, and where qualified legal work is worth the cost.
Indicative screening of one use case. It does not replace a full legal assessment.